Making A Murderer Update 28 : Supervillain Ken Kratz
Juror 11's Recent Statement
Click here for Update 3 – Response From Innocence Project
Click here for Update 4 – Another Suspect
Click here for Update 5 – Lawyer Dean Strang Speaks Out
Click here for Update 6 – Suspicious Damage to Teresa's Car
Making A Murderer Update 27 – Solving Making A Murderer: The Bones
Juror 11's Recent Statement
Click here for Update 3 – Response From Innocence Project
Click here for Update 4 – Another Suspect
Click here for Update 5 – Lawyer Dean Strang Speaks Out
Click here for Update 6 – Suspicious Damage to Teresa's Car
Making A Murderer Update 26 – What Kratz Left Out 1: No Murder Weapon
Outside of speculation, Kratz never presented a murder weapon that could be conclusively linked to Steven Avery. The Avery’s were hunting folk, and bullets were found all over their property. Kratz presented a single crushed bullet that had no grooves on it, therefore rendering it unable to indicate which weapon had fired it. Kratz claimed the bullet had Teresa’s DNA on it, yet the bullet didn’t have any blood on it and had been contaminated by an incompetent lab technician. Kratz theorised that it had been fired by Steven Avery’s .22 without a shred of proof because the bullet was unreadable. At least one of Avery’s neighbours had a .22 rifle at home. Kratz claimed Teresa was chained to a bed, raped, tortured and had her throat slashed, yet he failed to produce any physical evidence such as marks or scratches on the bed frame. The knife that allegedly slashed Teresa’s throat was never found, nor were any handcuffs, chains or ropes with her DNA. If Teresa was shot eleven times, where were the other ten bullets? They should have fell out of her body at the burn site. Could it be that there was no murder weapon in the homes of Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey because they didn’t murder Teresa?
Juror 11's Recent Statement
Click here for Update 3 – Response From Innocence Project
Click here for Update 4 – Another Suspect
Click here for Update 5 – Lawyer Dean Strang Speaks Out
Click here for Update 6 – Suspicious Damage to Teresa's Car
Making A Murderer Update 25 – What Kratz Left Out 2: Bone Damage
A Canadian expert testified at the trial that the bonfire outside of Steven Avery’s house was incapable of causing such heat damage to the bones. It would have required a crematorium level of heat to reduce the bones into such a highly fragmented state, including considerable damage to the long bones, pelvis and skull. A lot of people are assuming Steven Avery is guilty because bones were found outside his property, which on the surface, is rather incriminating. But Kratz isn’t talking about how Steven’s bonfire couldn’t possibly have burnt the bones to a crisp because it suggests that the bones were moved there to frame Steven. Kratz was never interested in the truth as then his theater performance in court would have fallen apart.
Juror 11's Recent Statement
Click here for Update 3 – Response From Innocence Project
Click here for Update 4 – Another Suspect
Click here for Update 5 – Lawyer Dean Strang Speaks Out
Making A Murderer Update 24 – What Kratz Left Out 3: Teresa’s Car Was Towed
Juror 11's Recent Statement
Click here for Update 3 – Response From Innocence Project
Click here for Update 4 – Another Suspect
Click here for Update 5 – Lawyer Dean Strang Speaks Out